This image has been resized. Click on the View larger version link in the sidebar for a high-quality version.
Hide this message.
Image samples have been disabled. If you find this to be too slow, you can turn samples back on in your profile settings.
Search
Tags
- ? takami yuuki 10
- ? ro-kyu-bu! 480
- ? misawa maho 108
- ? bikini 90563
- ? swimsuits 129255
- ? scanning artifacts 1922 swimsuit swim suit mizugi scanningartifacts blue bikini green swimsuit rosalina bikini green bikini side-tie bikini black swimsuit tankini iguana bikini lovely bikini bikini skirt string bikini bikini shorts dracula bikini black bikini kirarin bikini micro bikini bikini bottom blue swimsuit purple bikini red bikini maid bikini competition swimsuits cow print bikini layered bikini wet swimsuit one-piece swimsuit yellow bikini competition swimsuit highleg swimsuit frilled bikini strapless bikini sports bikini two-tone bikini
Statistics
- Id: 237991
- Posted: almost 12 years ago by LoliPush
- Size: 3332x4267
- Rating: Safe
- Score: 36
- Favorited by: Thid, R1t0_S4m4, LxK, keykun058, jokeiko, Macaroni!, lochial, MysteriousBenefactor, jimmy123321, ryuokyo06, rensuchan, Sode_no_Shirayuki, BlackDragon2, emmacaballero1708, Onpu, beatna, studwalker, makiechang, crazy8olman, cosmic+T5, mikeodeo, ditama, Pikashi, lazymushi, nooanianqueetus, Elitemiku, Chris086, Makaila, vita, dragoncaliber (24 more)
LoliPush
almost 12 years agoadmin2
almost 12 years agoFrom a quick glance I think the filtering was overdone, did you use a lot of blur before using Neat Image?
Did you try any suggestions from forum #10739
If you can upload the raw scan somewhere I can see what can be done to help improve results.
LoliPush
almost 12 years agoMy usual approach is to use GREYCstoration and a Photoshop surface blur before apply Neat Image and then a Unsharpen Mask 2. I tend to blur quite heavily then clean up the remaining noise with Neat Image afterwards, before sharpening. Perhaps this is the wrong approach.
I have read through various forum threads and tried to take in as much advice as possible. However, there are so many filters, settings, types of noise... and all this information is distributed across a lot of forum threads, many of them filled with posts that aren't useful. It's difficult for someone with only a basic knowledge of digital imagery to get started. I figured that rather than just reading, I'd learn more by experimenting by myself and taking note of any criticism my uploads receive.
Last time I saw a raw scan get uploaded here it was simply deleted (without being replaced). If could tell me of a convenient place to upload I'll do so. That said, I have a couple hundred raw scans here and ultimately I think I need to be cleaning them myself.
admin2
almost 12 years agoSomeday (I hope) we'll organize the data bit better, maybe with screencasts instead, sorry for the hassle.
Personally, I use generic actions in Photoshop that produces pretty good results, I've uploaded it ( https://yande.re/300dpi.atn and https://yande.re/module.atn ) The action I use the most is AM high quality.
Others might weigh in to this, but longer conversations we usually move to IRC, makes it easier to have real time communications.
aoie emesai
almost 12 years agoadmin2
almost 12 years agoRadioactive
almost 12 years agoLoliPush
almost 12 years agoI'm afraid the actions aren't very useful to me because I have no idea in what situations to apply them. Studying the way those actions select areas to apply filters to was somewhat educational at least. FYI, the "AM high quality" action uses a "color adjust" sub-action in the last step which isn't included in either of those action files.
It seems I have a lot more to learn than I thought, so rather than waste more of your time by asking for more help, I think it's probably best if I spend some more time trying things out for myself and deciding how much time I'm actually willing/able to put into this. Thanks again.
fireattack
almost 12 years ago