Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
How difficult (or appropriate) would it be if someone just removed the text and posted it as a child-wall? Might be possible to even get 16:9, especially if the left edge was extended a bit.
_Astara said: How difficult (or appropriate) would it be if someone just removed the text and posted it as a child-wall? Might be possible to even get 16:9, especially if the left edge was extended a bit.
HomerKiller said: no wallpaper lol jesus I was a fool but this is good in its own way I guess
It is still wallpaper, as there are *plenty* of purposed/official 16:10 wallpapers out there (probably more so than 16:9), as well as monitors that favor it over the traditional "Full HD" ratio. Also, Over Drive has been posting calender wallpaper like this for a while now…
It is still wallpaper, as there are *plenty* of purposed/official 16:10 wallpapers out there (probably more so than 16:9), as well as monitors that favor it over the traditional "Full HD" ratio. Also, Over Drive has been posting calender wallpaper like this for a while now…
I mentioned mostly getting rid of the text, though resizing for 16:9 wouldn't be hard now either -- but since others don't really seem keen on that format (hey, it works on my TV! ;-)), I'll post a 16:10 for a 2560x1600 monitor...
Note: this is just as a 'trial balloon' (it's not really something I'd consider finished, BUT as it is, it's not TOO FAR off the quality of this original). post #306714 is a child of the original (in this case a 2560x1600) -- though I extended the sky on both sides enough to make a HD-ratio as well (that would obviously show less JPG artifacting.
HomerKiller
over 9 years agoAstara
over 9 years agonsta-01
over 9 years agoTheGoldenStag
over 9 years agoAstara
over 9 years agoI'll post a 16:10 for a 2560x1600 monitor...
Note: this is just as a 'trial balloon' (it's not really something I'd consider finished, BUT as it is, it's not TOO FAR off the quality of this original).
post #306714 is a child of the original (in this case a 2560x1600) -- though I extended the sky on both sides enough to make a HD-ratio as well (that would obviously show less JPG artifacting.