Ahhh you gotta love this artist ^^

Yeah, I do believe this is a possible dupe.

IMO there is enough difference between the two to not bother with the duplicate tag. Just keep the P&C

I see a color difference....midzki probably has the copy..so he should be able to tell which one has the closest colors. (and delete the other after).

syaoran-kun said:
I see a color difference....midzki probably has the copy..so he should be able to tell which one has the closest colors. (and delete the other after).

This was midzki's scan. I did however adjust contrast a bit, I have a fetish? for more contrast I guess...

Personally I would leave it here, but that it down to the OP, and the decision of other mods.

post #34573 will be scanned from different source, but it's too reddish in my eyes :P

Eruru said:
This was midzki's scan. I did however adjust contrast a bit, I have a fetish? for more contrast I guess...

I'm scanning slightly less contrasted comparing prints to be able to re-adjust colors because high-contrasted images can't adjust colors.
So your taste is natural ;)

midzki said:
post #34573 will be scanned from different source, but it's too reddish in my eyes :P

after I looked at it closely, it has traces of extraction.
so I guesss it's scanned from same source, then extracted, and somehow compressed at jpeg :p

Radioactive said:
IMO there is enough difference between the two to not bother with the duplicate tag. Just keep the P&C

Yeah, i saw the other one. Extraction or not, the different is significant enough to keep them off of the dupe tag.

yep. the difference is sighnificant.
1) low res
2) jpeg artifact
3) shaggish extraction
4) red tint
5) overfiltering
or others?

1) So?
2) Where?
3) Agreed
4) Agreed
5) Agreed

I'll let another mod make a judgement call.

I'm for deleting it because:

1) It's not an equal/different version (like "high contrast/nude/shopped")
It's just poorly extracted and jpeg'd etc..

2) We now have a better scan