Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Date Mar 24, 2012UserRadioactiveRating SafeScore16
basically you need to condence the width of it a little: http://i.minus.com/icqOtF2VSd9s4.jpg I tried to align head and left foot, and then the body is out of its position.
fireattack said: basically you need to condence the width of it a little: http://i.minus.com/icqOtF2VSd9s4.jpg I tried to align head and left foot, and then the body is out of its position.
Her body does squeeze a little bit after her belly. I will see what I can do with the proportion next time. Thanks for noticing that.
I dumped the individual images into ICE and the results were extremely similar with the right camera mode. Proportions seem the same. Maybe I'm not noticing the little details though.....
yeah ICE sometimes gave very great results for dakimakuras (most of time w/ rotating motion methtod). I checked this one, only 1-2 lines are misaligned, and the porportion is good enough for a auto-stitch software.
I ended up sticking with Planar 1 for the images I tried the other day (with planar 2 and 3 distorting the proportions too much especially the heads), since it seemed like the alignment was slightly worse with rotating motion but I only really compared a couple of images.
I read through the FAQ on the microsoft site which suggests planar is better for compositing multiple flat images (which is what a dakimakura should be), and rotating motion is for traditional panoramic photography. Both modes looked very similar to my eyes I must admit.
Actually thinking about it more, do you guys have any examples where ICE has major failure? I am curious to see if there is any ways to improve the result.
1986chxr
about 12 years agokris1986k
about 12 years agokris1986k
about 12 years agoWhiteExecutor
about 12 years agosure, whateve-
"by huke"
wat
Radioactive
about 12 years agoryugakure 23
about 12 years agoikyo
about 12 years agofireattack
about 12 years agodandan550
about 12 years agoAlgester
about 12 years agoRiven
about 12 years agoTrit
about 12 years agofireattack
about 12 years agofireattack
about 12 years agohttp://i.minus.com/icqOtF2VSd9s4.jpg
I tried to align head and left foot, and then the body is out of its position.
Not a big deal, maybe im too picky :/
castle
about 12 years agoXcalibur
about 12 years agofireattack
about 12 years agoXcalibur
about 12 years agoI read through the FAQ on the microsoft site which suggests planar is better for compositing multiple flat images (which is what a dakimakura should be), and rotating motion is for traditional panoramic photography. Both modes looked very similar to my eyes I must admit.
It's good enough for an amateur like me anyway.
castle
about 12 years agoNyamNyam
about 12 years agolivorno99
about 12 years agoNyamNyam
about 12 years agokamikaze261
about 12 years agoshadowrobin
about 12 years ago