Close
 
A higher res version of this one always comes out ^^. This should be sufficient size now ^^
 
Date Feb 3, 2008 User Radioactive Rating Safe Score 22
HOLY CRAP! What a huge size while preserving the detail and quality. It has a minor amount of jpeg artifacts too *drool*
aoie_emesai said:
HOLY CRAP! What a huge size while preserving the detail and quality. It has a minor amount of jpeg artifacts too *drool*
Is this really a scan? I thought this was a digital original.
Looks like a digital original or a vector of a scan.
I really thought it was a vector myself, but I don't think it's a digital original. If you zoom far enough, and add some brightness and contrast you can see the jpeg artifacts. Otherwise this one and the other one radioactive posted are very good quality.
aoie_emesai said:
I really thought it was a vector myself, but I don't think it's a digital original. If you zoom far enough, and add some brightness and contrast you can see the jpeg artifacts. Otherwise this one and the other one radioactive posted are very good quality.
Well, one generation removed from original, anyway.

It's sort of cool how some digital art discs actually have layered PSDs.
 
Date Dec 6, 2007 User van Rating Explicit Score 14
Is there a right half to this? Can't find it ...
 
Date Feb 2, 2008 User petopeto Rating Safe Score 19 Hidden 7
Might want to add that to the tag guidelines.
petopeto said:
Might want to add that to the tag guidelines.
Yep, just did, I hope people actually read it <_<;
I'm flipping annoyed that I have to go through and tidy this up.

If you must post these images then I must insist that you use Parent/Child posts as well. I, for one, don't like to see the post area spammed with L images. Especially low-res ones.

When P/C the posts it would be worth adding a warning about the content. Don't forget this site is available world-wide.
Uh, you didn't ask me to do it, so don't be annoyed that you're doing it.
petopeto said:
Uh, you didn't ask me to do it, so don't be annoyed that you're doing it.
I didn't even know you were still live on the site (Hurry up with the user list admin2)

It saves you the trouble of doing it.
Radioactive said:
I didn't even know you were still live on the site (Hurry up with the user list admin2)
I just don't want to make work for other people (especially for images they don't like), and it's frustrating to have someone irate at me without being given a chance to do the work myself ...
 
Date Feb 3, 2008 User Radioactive Rating Safe Score 29
Explicit? What?

I'm locking the rating.
Radioactive said:
Explicit? What?

I'm locking the rating.
Can anonymous users rate?

And we can't in any way see what users edit the rating, can we?
And we can't in any way see what users edit the rating, can we?
I'm waiting for an answer from admin2 about that. I can see the history for tag changes, but not rating.
Not sure how to implement that one, since there's the whole rating:s,e,q thing that is considered special tags. I will have to take a look in to it.
 
Date Feb 3, 2008 User aoie_emesai Rating Safe Score 30
 
Strange effect on the hair...?
You are right. What's that weird honey combed shape texture on the hair.
I think that's the way that the artist draws it in the manga. The effect shows up rarely in the anime.
vistigris said:
I think that's the way that the artist draws it in the manga. The effect shows up rarely in the anime.
I thought it was a scanning artifact for a while...,
 
This is completly safe, so might any op/admin lock the rating?
Kamisama said:
This is completly safe, so might any op/admin lock the rating?
Should I be classing bikinis/swimsuits as questionable?

I can lock the rating at safe if I'm being too cautious.
Radioactive said:
Should I be classing bikinis/swimsuits as questionable?
Well do you find those offending?

Watching babes in swimsuits/bikinis at work is not wrong (if your a guy). And drawn ones is not an exception.
Looks safe to me. I think that bikini/swimsuits should only be questionable if the pose is suggestive, if the swimsuit is falling off, or if something similar is going on.
I agree with vis, the pose would have a bearing on it's rating too. Say sitting in a sexually provocative manner would warrant a questionable rating but not explicit, unless parts of her clothes are missing or not in the right place, or something like that.
Kamisama said:
Well do you find those offending?
Well no, but I've got to rate the scans for a general audience.

I'll start using safe for most swimsuits/bikinis scans and lock the rating for this scan as safe.
 
Date Nov 25, 2006 User vita Rating Questionable Score 56
 
Date Feb 3, 2008 User Radioactive Rating Questionable Score 0
It's Tasuku Iizuki the artist?