Mods, we have a higher amount than normal of spam in the forum. Can you reach out to the admins and see what they can do to reduce this?
https://yande.re/pool/show/6199
https://yande.re/pool/show/6195
Could mods please ban the users who create these? There should be no excuse for them to 'accidentally' create pools
https://yande.re/pool/show/6195
Could mods please ban the users who create these? There should be no excuse for them to 'accidentally' create pools
https://yande.re/pool/show/6195 is still there mods. What are you doing?
Deleted and send a message to the user. If the user does it enough then you're free to ban or whatever.
https://yande.re/pool/show/6209 It's time to ban him.Mr_GT said:
Deleted and send a message to the user. If the user does it enough then you're free to ban or whatever.
https://yande.re/user/show/376622 probably the same user. Please ban his IP
Done (may have some leftovers though as they're using an ISP with dynamic IPs).Radioactive said:
https://yande.re/user/show/376622 probably the same user. Please ban his IP
https://yande.re/pool/show/6230
https://yande.re/pool/show/6231
Are duplicate pools of
https://yande.re/pool/show/4936
https://yande.re/pool/show/4922
I see no reason to retain the new pools.
https://yande.re/pool/show/6231
Are duplicate pools of
https://yande.re/pool/show/4936
https://yande.re/pool/show/4922
I see no reason to retain the new pools.
Deleted - the contents of the newer pair are the same as those of the older pair.Radioactive said:
https://yande.re/pool/show/6230
https://yande.re/pool/show/6231
Are duplicate pools of
https://yande.re/pool/show/4936
https://yande.re/pool/show/4922
I see no reason to retain the new pools.
It's going to require a IP ban, and needs to be updated once he creates alt accounts after his IP address changes
Please try not to ban whole class B IP ranges. That means thousands of individual IP addresses and I've already got complaints from (legit) users that they were banned for no reason.moonian said:
Done (may have some leftovers though as they're using an ISP with dynamic IPs).
I removed all the recent IP bans since I don't know which one affects them, but feel free to add back (in a smaller scale) if the vandalism comes back.
Please add back the Korea's IP ranges (Korea Telecom) - that troll is the only Korean on that ISP I know that "uses" this site.fireattack said:
Please try not to ban whole class B IP ranges. That means thousands of individual IP addresses and I've already got complaints from (legit) users that they were banned for no reason.
I removed all the recent IP bans since I don't know which one affects them, but feel free to add back (in a smaller scale) if the vandalism comes back.
Your deletions has already enabled them to troll freely yet again (they use dynamic IP addresses, so adding individual IPs won't help at all (not to mention the next user that got assigned that IP address will also get the effect you mentioned), so I have no choice but to add them (back) whenever they use an IP address within a new IP range (will shorten the banning duration though)).
I knew they use dynamic IP addresses and I knew they're from Korea Telecom (because the legitimate user who complained to me *is* from Korea).moonian said:
Please add back the Korea's IP ranges (Korea Telecom) - that troll is the only Korean on that ISP I know that "uses" this site.
Your deletions has already enabled them to troll freely yet again (they use dynamic IP addresses, so adding individual IPs won't help at all (not to mention the next user that got assigned that IP address will also get the effect you mentioned), so I have no choice but to add them (back) whenever they use an IP address within a new IP range (will shorten the banning duration though)).
The main point is, do not ban B class section (x.x.0.0). That's ridiculous. You can try to ban C section at most.
> not to mention the next user that got assigned that IP address will also get the effect you mentioned)
Affecting 1 IP address is totally different from affecting 256^2 IP addresses.
Range now modified to /18. Please comment if it needs limited to even smaller range.fireattack said:
I knew they use dynamic IP addresses and I knew they're from Korea Telecom (because the legitimate user who complained to me *is* from Korea).
The main point is, do not ban B class section (x.x.0.0). That's ridiculous. You can try to ban C section at most.
> not to mention the next user that got assigned that IP address will also get the effect you mentioned)
Affecting 1 IP address is totally different from affecting 256^2 IP addresses.
https://yande.re/user/show/377386 ban please and delete the pool he created.
https://yande.re/user/show/372945 and this one can join them for tag sabotage
容我用中文提問，雖然看得懂各位談話內容，但是要用英文對談還是不太行
請問有辦法做到限制新帳號幾天以內禁止創建 "pool" 嗎?
請問有辦法做到限制新帳號幾天以內禁止創建 "pool" 嗎?
Using machine translation.fairyren said:
容我用中文提問，雖然看得懂各位談話內容，但是要用英文對談還是不太行
請問有辦法做到限制新帳號幾天以內禁止創建 "pool" 嗎?
If there is a way to block pool creation for new users, then it has never been activated.
這個估計要Admin修改用戶權限才行（我一直不贊同一開戶就獲得Privileged這看來不低的權限）fairyren said:
容我用中文提問，雖然看得懂各位談話內容，但是要用英文對談還是不太行
請問有辦法做到限制新帳號幾天以內禁止創建 "pool" 嗎?
https://yande.re/pool/show/6258
===========
要不要找Checkmate商量看看....
之前都是零星的，這次感覺就是硬要為之
馬上申請帳號馬上開始建立Pool
https://yande.re/user/show/377483
===========
要不要找Checkmate商量看看....
之前都是零星的，這次感覺就是硬要為之
馬上申請帳號馬上開始建立Pool
https://yande.re/user/show/377483
Radioactive