initial-g a1 kimi ga nozomu eien hayase mitsuki naked nipples | #112287 | yande.re

Try clearing out cookies of you have problem logging in/out.

Close

This image has been resized. Click on the View larger version link in the sidebar for a high-quality version. Hide this message.

Image samples have been disabled. If you find this to be too slow, you can turn samples back on in your profile settings.

« Previous Next » This post is #71 in the Initial-G (A1) - Enikki Recycle 13 pool.

a1 hayase_mitsuki initial-g kimi_ga_nozomu_eien naked nipples

Edit | Respond

JASH

over 14 years ago

OK, there should be a new tag invented (if there isn't one already) for this type of thing where the 'special' parts just aren't drawn, as I find it to be quite common. Perhaps one that could apply to any body part simply not being there...

spalose

over 14 years ago

and what would that tag be called/is called? cause i am noticing it a lot more also

JASH

over 14 years ago

spalose said:
and what would that tag be called/is called? cause i am noticing it a lot more also

I don't know, maybe something like 'lazy_artist' or some short form of it. Never mind, that could offend the artist...

spalose

over 14 years ago

at first i thought it could go under 'error' but at the same time its prob artists decision to leave 'it' out, so that's not really an error now is it?

Chrissues

over 14 years ago

'special parts' ey...

Why tag something that a) isn't there and b) is fairly well covered by the absence of the tags for specific body parts?
Seems superfluous to me

JASH

over 14 years ago

Perhaps 'missing_parts' or (again) some short form of it...
perhaps this should move over to the forums...

JASH

over 14 years ago

Chrissues said:
Why tag something that a) isn't there and b) is fairly well covered by the absence of the tags for specific body parts?
Seems superfluous to me

You sort of have a point, but i guess so that if someone has a strange attraction to that sort of thing, they could find it with one tag, as opposed to searching 'naked'-'nipples'-'pussy'. Also, not all pics have been fully tagged.

Azarel

over 14 years ago

So should this be considered explicit? I mean if it was drawn it would be but...

Magey

over 14 years ago

I believe that drawings with the parts not being "there", are supposed to be considered tasteful "nudity" by the artist depending on the picture, I would see this as an example.

Debbie

over 14 years ago

I think it should be tagged as "censored" or "convenient_censoring" or something like that.