Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Date Dec 6, 2006Useradmin2Rating SafeScore8Hidden9
I always thought the "paper texture effect" was because it was a scan and never as good as the original image...Never knew it was because of textured paper..Anyways this looks hard...so i need time to think about it...Btw is the post section of moe.imouto down? I can't seem to access it with IE or Firefox not even with another com...
Processing for textured paper causes a drastic drop in detail, but for "untextured" (Sorry for my ignorance but I have no idea what its called...) paper is the detail lost as much? can I request a link for a scan with "untextured" paper for reference. I think the 600dpi should stay though because it is easy to resize with a image editing softwares. Actually I think a poll or something would be rather useful in seeking public opinion on this matter. Seeing as how only two of us have replied to this post which is strange... Unless people don't really care about it one way or the other as long as they get their scans...
600dpi and unprocessed, the latest artbook sure is a great Christmas gift for me. Thanks for setting it that way! Sorry for the super late reply, was messing around with photopaper...
Anonymous
almost 18 years agoLunstar
almost 18 years agoAnonymous
almost 18 years agoLunstar
almost 18 years agoadmin2
almost 18 years ago600dpi:
http://imouto.org/nd600.jpg (9.8mb)
http://imouto.org/nd600p1.jpg (3.13mb)
http://imouto.org/nd600p2.jpg (7.19mb)
http://imouto.org/nd600p3.jpg (2.66mb)
300dpi:
http://imouto.org/nd300.jpg (1.67mb)
http://imouto.org/nd300p1.jpg (1.00mb)
http://imouto.org/nd300p2.jpg (1.06mb)
http://imouto.org/nd300p3.jpg (1.05mb)
JPEG quality of 8, any higher it would take too long to load.
Lunstar
almost 18 years ago