Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Date May 5, 2007UserTimon1771Rating QuestionableScore24Hidden1
whoever tried to tag this: The tag separator is space. If you're going to add a tag with spaces in it, replace them with underscores, elsewise you'll just create separate tags (eg "steel", "angel", and "kurumi" instead of "steel angel kurumi").
No, it's 32bit, and I wasn't talking about open areas like you have pointed out. I was looking at the outlines (which is were jpeg artifacts show on most images). Also, I've just been and checked on my other monitor and I still see them.
Anyway, I'm sure if someone else takes a look they can confirm what I've said. Since I know now that it's not just my monitor.
if anything.. this is the original one and the 1.11MB is the re-saved one
i've compared both images with FastStone Image Viewer's compare feature, and this image retains more details while the other one shows signs of a re-save
>>356 I could, but there are no 'critical' outlines. All the outlines in both images have artifacts surrounding them. There are just less artifacts in this one. Also, Shadow has just said basically the same thing (thanks for confirming by the way Shadow).
hmmm, i wish i knew the source .... the minitokyo one is the 1,1mb (since they dont allow pics to be larger than 2mb lol) im not sure if the animepaper one is 1,1mb only too... i thought this pic was a resave, too, with some shopped noise+filters or something
I always thought the "paper texture effect" was because it was a scan and never as good as the original image...Never knew it was because of textured paper..Anyways this looks hard...so i need time to think about it...Btw is the post section of moe.imouto down? I can't seem to access it with IE or Firefox not even with another com...
Processing for textured paper causes a drastic drop in detail, but for "untextured" (Sorry for my ignorance but I have no idea what its called...) paper is the detail lost as much? can I request a link for a scan with "untextured" paper for reference. I think the 600dpi should stay though because it is easy to resize with a image editing softwares. Actually I think a poll or something would be rather useful in seeking public opinion on this matter. Seeing as how only two of us have replied to this post which is strange... Unless people don't really care about it one way or the other as long as they get their scans...
600dpi and unprocessed, the latest artbook sure is a great Christmas gift for me. Thanks for setting it that way! Sorry for the super late reply, was messing around with photopaper...
Anonymous
over 17 years agothe millions of tags suck. :|
and if thats one of your bad vectors, i wanna see ur good ones ^^
Anonymous
over 17 years agoShadowVlican
over 17 years agohttp://anidb.info/perl-bin/animedb.pl?show=anime&aid=88
someone edit the tags as u see fit
Anonymous
over 17 years agoShadowVlican
over 17 years agowaha
over 17 years agoAnonymous
over 17 years agoAnyway, I'm sure if someone else takes a look they can confirm what I've said. Since I know now that it's not just my monitor.
MDGeist
over 17 years agoShadowVlican
over 17 years agoi've compared both images with FastStone Image Viewer's compare feature, and this image retains more details while the other one shows signs of a re-save
my monitor is a colour calibrated dell 2405
Anonymous
over 17 years agoI could, but there are no 'critical' outlines. All the outlines in both images have artifacts surrounding them. There are just less artifacts in this one. Also, Shadow has just said basically the same thing (thanks for confirming by the way Shadow).
MDGeist
over 17 years agothe minitokyo one is the 1,1mb (since they dont allow pics to be larger than 2mb lol)
im not sure if the animepaper one is 1,1mb only too...
i thought this pic was a resave, too, with some shopped noise+filters or something
ShadowVlican
over 17 years agoi appreciate the tendency towards high quality scans, so i'll be hanging around this site more often :)
Anonymous
almost 18 years agoLunstar
almost 18 years agoAnonymous
almost 18 years agoLunstar
almost 18 years agoadmin2
almost 18 years ago600dpi:
http://imouto.org/nd600.jpg (9.8mb)
http://imouto.org/nd600p1.jpg (3.13mb)
http://imouto.org/nd600p2.jpg (7.19mb)
http://imouto.org/nd600p3.jpg (2.66mb)
300dpi:
http://imouto.org/nd300.jpg (1.67mb)
http://imouto.org/nd300p1.jpg (1.00mb)
http://imouto.org/nd300p2.jpg (1.06mb)
http://imouto.org/nd300p3.jpg (1.05mb)
JPEG quality of 8, any higher it would take too long to load.
Lunstar
almost 18 years ago