No. All user gain "Privileged" level with unlimited upload since account created, so imposible to limit user right now. If Drop (Contributor level) or someone else (Privileged level) uploading Pools with 50+ images, you or anyone will remind them and it will cause new problem.hiroimo2 said:
I have been a little concerned lately.
The number of pictures being posted is like a flood, and the pictures are flowing too quickly. Of course, it's good that there are so many good pictures, however it seems that there are too many. It seems that someone are posting 60-100 per day.
How about setting a certain limit on the number of posts per person per day as a solution?
I think it would be better to set a limit of 30-50 posts per person per day.
The advantage of this can reduce the number of postings, and the quality of the pictures will be higher, since they will naturally have to be selective.
If Admin decide to limit user by downgrade user level from "Privileged" to "Member", their upload in pending status.
From begining "hold" function it's for batch upload with 30+ images, but mods give exception for Paid Rewards. Checkmate also create solution (forum #33520) but no one care about it and only few user follow it (me, whitespace, lacepanties) and since there no moderation until now, this rule seems pointless.Also, the excessive use of "hold" has become noticeable recently. Someone have as many as 600.
This may be intended to prevent flooding, but it also seems to be a side effect of being able to post without restrictions.
If the "Acitivate all held posts" is accidentally pressed, something terrible will happen.
I appreciate that they post good pictures, I think it's better to be as safe as possible.
我也覺得現在的圖實在太過氾濫
現在這裡只是變成另一個高解析度版的danbooru或gelbooru而已
以前這裡大部分都是官方圖跟掃圖為主
如果要貼繪師圖至少也都是出過商業作品的商業繪師
現在是什麼繪師圖通通都往這裡傳
現在這裡只是變成另一個高解析度版的danbooru或gelbooru而已
以前這裡大部分都是官方圖跟掃圖為主
如果要貼繪師圖至少也都是出過商業作品的商業繪師
現在是什麼繪師圖通通都往這裡傳
Thank you for answering.Arsy said:
No. All user gain "Privileged" level with unlimited upload since account created, so imposible to limit user right now. If Drop (Contributor level) or someone else (Privileged or Member level) uploading Pools with 50+ images, you or anyone will remind them and it will cause new problem.
I too think there is a problem if the rules restrict it.
I hope the admin or engineer here could change the system to limit the number of posts for all users. Usually, a limit of about 50 posts per day is not a problem, as most posts are within the limit.
"hold" is now used in most pictures from Pixiv and X (Twitter), not only for paid rewards. I think the issue of usage needs to be discussed separately. I believe that the current situation where an inordinate amount of holds are accumulated is better solved by the system.From begining "hold" function it's for batch upload with 30+ images, but mods give exception for Paid Rewards. Checkmate also create solution (forum #33520) but no one care about it and only few user follow it (me, whitespace, lacepanties) and since there no moderation until now, this rule seems pointless.
Thank you for your feedback.sorafans said:
我也覺得現在的圖實在太過氾濫
現在這裡只是變成另一個高解析度版的danbooru或gelbooru而已
以前這裡大部分都是官方圖跟掃圖為主
如果要貼繪師圖至少也都是出過商業作品的商業繪師
現在是什麼繪師圖通通都往這裡傳
It is true that the percentage of amateur works posted is high.
With the spread of paid rewards such as FANBOX and improvements in PC specs, the number of high-resolution pictures has increased significantly. Therefore, I think it is necessary to carefully select and post pictures with higher quality.
The standards differ depending on the person, however for example, if that person is currently posting a picture with a score of 6 or above, I hope to create a situation where they will carefully select with a score of 8 or above.
我認為這網站經營那麼久已經很不容易,從我學生時期到出社會工作這網站都一直還存在著。站長從來不會要求我們斗內跟放上廣告尋求維持網站運作的資金已經是很無私的貢獻。畢竟網站的程式碼已經很老舊了,要替換整個網站架構去優化用戶的瀏覽體驗,除非管理員想要這麼做。
主要是站長目前對於這網站的定義,他從來沒禁止也沒限制過能上傳什麼類型的圖片,如果管理員的定義是這裡只能上傳官方IP圖跟雜誌掃圖我想應該不會有人每天來光顧吧?而且這裡高質量的圖片想上傳都受限於解析度太低,審核low-res也要等mod有空
比較過很多圖站,還是只有這裡比較好,後面冒出的anime-pictures.net雜圖更多,審核更寬鬆,看了好幾次也都是從這邊把圖轉貼過去而已。
圖片氾濫主要是K站的出現,這東西該怎麼說,有好有壞。好處是就算我今天沒投錢贊助了,帖子圖片都還是會保留著,不掏錢也能持續免費瀏覽,除非網站倒了。就算我知道這個網站,我還是不敢拿我的API key給它,我寧願自己把文章保存成PDF格式。缺點就是會造成投錢給藝術家的的人變少,即便創作者三令五申使用各種方式防堵付費內容洩漏,但是圖片只要一旦出現在網路,傳播就很快,你就算想阻止別人公開,以後還是會有別人這麼做。
如果業餘畫師的圖片不能上傳這裡我覺得這是條多餘的限制,即便現在看起來畫技很low的畫師或許將來會出名,我們不能埋沒任何可能性。如果有贊助過美和野らぐ或yuga-的人一定看過她們10年前的作品是多麼不堪入目。我必須強調一點:圖片的分數不能代表一切,無論它是安全還是限制級別,我不敢說我上傳的圖片每張都是最好的,就算是Pixiv當日排行前10名的圖片放在這裡,它獲得的分數可能也不會超過任何一張限制級圖片,分數低這樣算是不合標準嗎?所以說這裡能接納各式各樣的圖片,如果當初網站叫萌妹,那就要多上傳萌圖(?
主要是站長目前對於這網站的定義,他從來沒禁止也沒限制過能上傳什麼類型的圖片,如果管理員的定義是這裡只能上傳官方IP圖跟雜誌掃圖我想應該不會有人每天來光顧吧?而且這裡高質量的圖片想上傳都受限於解析度太低,審核low-res也要等mod有空
比較過很多圖站,還是只有這裡比較好,後面冒出的anime-pictures.net雜圖更多,審核更寬鬆,看了好幾次也都是從這邊把圖轉貼過去而已。
圖片氾濫主要是K站的出現,這東西該怎麼說,有好有壞。好處是就算我今天沒投錢贊助了,帖子圖片都還是會保留著,不掏錢也能持續免費瀏覽,除非網站倒了。就算我知道這個網站,我還是不敢拿我的API key給它,我寧願自己把文章保存成PDF格式。缺點就是會造成投錢給藝術家的的人變少,即便創作者三令五申使用各種方式防堵付費內容洩漏,但是圖片只要一旦出現在網路,傳播就很快,你就算想阻止別人公開,以後還是會有別人這麼做。
如果業餘畫師的圖片不能上傳這裡我覺得這是條多餘的限制,即便現在看起來畫技很low的畫師或許將來會出名,我們不能埋沒任何可能性。如果有贊助過美和野らぐ或yuga-的人一定看過她們10年前的作品是多麼不堪入目。我必須強調一點:圖片的分數不能代表一切,無論它是安全還是限制級別,我不敢說我上傳的圖片每張都是最好的,就算是Pixiv當日排行前10名的圖片放在這裡,它獲得的分數可能也不會超過任何一張限制級圖片,分數低這樣算是不合標準嗎?所以說這裡能接納各式各樣的圖片,如果當初網站叫萌妹,那就要多上傳萌圖(?
Thank you for your opinion.whitespace1 said:
我認為這網站經營那麼久已經很不容易,從我學生時期到出社會工作這網站都一直還存在著。站長從來不會要求我們斗內跟放上廣告尋求維持網站運作的資金已經是很無私的貢獻。畢竟網站的程式碼已經很老舊了,要替換整個網站架構去優化用戶的瀏覽體驗,除非管理員想要這麼做。
主要是站長目前對於這網站的定義,他從來沒禁止也沒限制過能上傳什麼類型的圖片,如果管理員的定義是這裡只能上傳官方IP圖跟雜誌掃圖我想應該不會有人每天來光顧吧?而且這裡高質量的圖片想上傳都受限於解析度太低,審核low-res也要等mod有空
比較過很多圖站,還是只有這裡比較好,後面冒出的anime-pictures.net雜圖更多,審核更寬鬆,看了好幾次也都是從這邊把圖轉貼過去而已。
圖片氾濫主要是K站的出現,這東西該怎麼說,有好有壞。好處是就算我今天沒投錢贊助了,帖子圖片都還是會保留著,不掏錢也能持續免費瀏覽,除非網站倒了。就算我知道這個網站,我還是不敢拿我的API key給它,我寧願自己把文章保存成PDF格式。缺點就是會造成投錢給藝術家的的人變少,即便創作者三令五申使用各種方式防堵付費內容洩漏,但是圖片只要一旦出現在網路,傳播就很快,你就算想阻止別人公開,以後還是會有別人這麼做。
如果業餘畫師的圖片不能上傳這裡我覺得這是條多餘的限制,即便現在看起來畫技很low的畫師或許將來會出名,我們不能埋沒任何可能性。如果有贊助過美和野らぐ或yuga-的人一定看過她們10年前的作品是多麼不堪入目。我必須強調一點:圖片的分數不能代表一切,無論它是安全還是限制級別,我不敢說我上傳的圖片每張都是最好的,就算是Pixiv當日排行前10名的圖片放在這裡,它獲得的分數可能也不會超過任何一張限制級圖片,分數低這樣算是不合標準嗎?所以說這裡能接納各式各樣的圖片,如果當初網站叫萌妹,那就要多上傳萌圖(?
There are some good pictures even by amateurs. I’m also against banning posting of it. However, if there are a large number of pictures, I thought it was necessary to carefully select.
Since there are no advertisements here, we can imagine that the maintenance costs for connection lines and servers are high. It may be possible to suppress their increase by suppressing posting to some extent.
其實我們都有很好的借鏡,早期的mod如Radioactive在管理的時候,那個時候的po圖標準更高,很多不符合人體解剖學結構的圖片跟質量低的圖片他們會直接刪除,那時候po圖片都要很仔細挑選,而且是大家都照著規矩在走一天30張以內,只要發現你有淹沒首頁的行為就會PM警告你,現在的標準已經放很寬了,僅多mod會吐槽解剖學異常的圖片(這個可憐的女孩!)
至於圖片氾濫我深有同感,尤其是同樣的圖片變體重複看到真的會煩。自從Checkmate發佈公告後,我一直照著他的規定走,就算是子帖我也僅多放1-2張較佳的變體讓它顯示在index頁面上,有時候甚至只顯示父帖,對於不孰悉這網站運作的人,根本就不會看到其它子帖,但我覺得Checkmate作法就是為了避免index圖片氾濫,我認為有維持的必要性。雖然藝術作品本來就是讓人欣賞
至於圖片氾濫我深有同感,尤其是同樣的圖片變體重複看到真的會煩。自從Checkmate發佈公告後,我一直照著他的規定走,就算是子帖我也僅多放1-2張較佳的變體讓它顯示在index頁面上,有時候甚至只顯示父帖,對於不孰悉這網站運作的人,根本就不會看到其它子帖,但我覺得Checkmate作法就是為了避免index圖片氾濫,我認為有維持的必要性。雖然藝術作品本來就是讓人欣賞
The only way to limit user is downgrade user level, but I'm sure active uploader not happy with that. If level user downgraded to "Member", there lots posts need mods approval. Like whitespace said above, that time mods give reminder if user uploading more than 30 images, but now user can uploading image without limit.hiroimo2 said:
Thank you for answering.
I too think there is a problem if the rules restrict it.
I hope the admin or engineer here could change the system to limit the number of posts for all users. Usually, a limit of about 50 posts per day is not a problem, as most posts are within the limit.
I'm only holding Pixiv images to not flooding the mainindex what would happen when uploading them all at once. I'm always exerted for not holding them for too long. So I hope this isn't a problem for you.hiroimo2 said:
"hold" is now used in most pictures from Pixiv and X (Twitter), not only for paid rewards. I think the issue of usage needs to be discussed separately. I believe that the current situation where an inordinate amount of holds are accumulated is better solved by the system.
Thank you for answering.BattlequeenYume said:
I'm only holding Pixiv images to not flooding the mainindex what would happen when uploading them all at once. I'm always exerted for not holding them for too long. So I hope this isn't a problem for you.
Sorry I might be misleading you. I'm more concerned about the number of uses for "hold" than the purpose of use. I think it would be better to reduce the number of posts for reduce this.
This is just a guideline, Based on the number of votes I searched, about half of the pictures you posted were rated high, and half were rated normal. It's average compared to other posters, so there's no problem in itself. However, since you post about 5 times as many posts, even the highly rated pictures you posted get pushed to the back of the page. I think it's a waste for you too.
By carefully selecting the pictures you post, the value of your posts will increase.
hiroimo2
Regarding optimization for number of posts
The number of pictures being posted is like a flood, and the pictures are flowing too quickly. Of course, it's good that there are so many good pictures, however it seems that there are too many. It seems that someone are posting 60-100 per day.
How about setting a certain limit on the number of posts per person per day as a solution?
I think it would be better to set a limit of 30-50 posts per person per day.
The advantage of this can reduce the number of postings, and the quality of the pictures will be higher, since they will naturally have to be selective.
Also, the excessive use of "hold" has become noticeable recently. Someone have as many as 600.
This may be intended to prevent flooding, but it also seems to be a side effect of being able to post without restrictions.
If the "Acitivate all held posts" is accidentally pressed, something terrible will happen.
I appreciate that they post good pictures, I think it's better to be as safe as possible.
I would like to hear everyone's opinions.
Cheers