Close
 
Less than a 1% upscale? What was the point other than getting yourself in trouble with the mods by rating safe?
 
Date Aug 27, 2010 User Radioactive Rating Safe Score 29
someone with some skills would be lovely to stitch these two frames together.
Isn't /it/she/he a male? ·o·
 
Date Sep 26, 2010 User fairyren Rating Questionable Score 114
What is funny about it? I find it really beautiful. ·_·
"XDDDD"
means evil smile ...
Osikaa said:
What is funny about it? I find it really beautiful. ·_·
Hm, yes, a girl with a seductive smile on her face laying in a sexy pose that exposes some 'private parts'. I would say that this is cute, not beautiful, beautiful would be her in a Lolita fashion dress sitting elegantly on the bed, or more preferably a dark colored chair.

I can be very disregarding, fear me *Mutters something*.
Salgada said:
Hm, yes, a girl with a seductive smile on her face laying in a sexy pose that exposes some 'private parts'. I would say that this is cute, not beautiful, beautiful would be her in a Lolita fashion dress sitting elegantly on the bed, or more preferably a dark colored chair.

I can be very disregarding, fear me *Mutters something*.
o_O Well, I also was talking about color...
Or you only mind about the pose and things?
I admire artists that give a good coloring. I'm terrible at it.
ú_ú
 
Date Sep 29, 2010 User sxx Rating Safe Score 78
Waah! A new masterpiece for us fans of /landscape! *_*
Thank you Sxx <3
 
"A image can be tagged bottomless if the character in them is wearing panties or a swimsuit underneath their clothing."? I can't understand this at all.
blooregardo said:
No because topless + bottomless = naked which they aren't.
OK, fair enough, I edited the tag description to clarify that the two shouldn't be used together so others won't get confused in the future. ( ̄~ ̄)

fireattack said:
"A image can be tagged bottomless if the character in them is wearing panties or a swimsuit underneath their clothing."? I can't understand this at all.
I think the idea is a girl who's wearing a blouse, but no skirt. Even if she has panties on she'd still be "bottomless" because her skirt's removed.
Manabi said:
I think the idea is a girl who's wearing a blouse, but no skirt. Even if she has panties on she'd still be "bottomless" because her skirt's removed.
I got it, but actually we only tag the images includes such things as "pantsu". So I think we should edit the wiki article.
Bulzeeb said:
AZD-A9S: Those 4 are a family, Parsee and Yuugi have nothing to do with em asides appearing in the same game.
Uh~ no no no NO~!
What I was referring to at that time (2 months ago post by the way for reference up above these comments) is where do the person who tagged Parsee is shown in this image?

The answer? Parsee is not in this image - tags have been corrected.
THAT is what I was referring to at that time.
Hmm, seems bottomless now is more like just "no_skirt".. That's what I don't know >_> (I thought it means nopan+no_skirt before) Then I think nothing wrong that tag a image with "topless + bottomless".. because it doesn't equal naked.
 
First time ever, Miya ever shown alot of skin in official art.
Musubi do look a lil bit to much like Kana from Minami-ke tho.
 
Date Sep 4, 2010 User fairyren Rating Safe Score 32
 
Date Sep 29, 2010 User Manabi Rating Safe Score 20
Patchy's just as happy as she can be with a good book!
♪(゚▽^*)ノ⌒☆
 
Start the countdown to one w/o the text.
I hope you realize that would be extremely hard to do with this specific scan.
 
Date Aug 13, 2009 User charunetra Rating Safe Score 24
lol, bringing comunism to Athena.
tengokuno said:
lol, bringing comunism to Athena.
Suwa War ... that simbol has nothing to do with the image.