Close
 
Date Apr 9, 2007 User GipFace Rating Questionable Score 41 Hidden 1
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
Pedophilia spotted plz delete this
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
Gotta love how some peoples can't understand the beautifulness of some pics
Wallpaper'd this, god damn that's awesome...
photoshop, irfanview, paint, or just use gimp to resize it to 1280 / 1024 or whatever
 
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
post it then...
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
scan them ?
Pay for another copy so I can debind it?
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
would make one undebound version first, to see if its worth it :3
 
Date Jul 11, 2007 User Anonymous Rating Questionable Score 45 Hidden 1
too bad 2 scans are censored by the scanner :|
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
I don't think these are from the Girls Museum 2005-2006 scans though.
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
18+ is ok considering some pics here show nipples and such..
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
most waveride pillows show more than that...
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
im just warning in case there's kid lurking here about to download 18+ content from torrent =/ probably none but better safe than _____

i will upload one explicit image.
im Kanze, original poster here
will upload rest of decent image, pardon my slow upload speed

some of the image are based on anime series i think, cause i saw shuffle in one of them
 
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
Hard to tell. Animepaper scans can suck badly...
6470 and 6471 werent accepted... and no, i wont upload the 11mb raws again
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
MDGeist, your raws were crappy quality and were subsequently very very quickly deleted. We can see the quality and we're pretty picky about it as you might as well know, so please refrain from wasting our time. Besides, don't you have some 4chan trolling to do?
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
Define crappy :
7443 x 5254 doesnt seem that bad, considering this 1831er version is just a resize...
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
The size doesn't matter. It is the quality of the scan that is important.
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
Resize the 11mb raws to 19xx and youll see, they are the same!
 
Date Jun 17, 2007 User Anonymous Rating Safe Score 14 Hidden 8
PS is often used for fixed sized images (read : Wallpaper) though.

However enlarging your hours of work in PS to a size of lets say >>630 is NOT possible...
You had to start at that size , which will most likely kill your memory ^^
>>738

You can make vectorized shape layers in Photoshop (Pen Tool), it's just not as powerful as in Illustrator.
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
no
read above: you can make vectors in photoshop but you can only save the paths. it's not the same, since you cannot use the vector in case you need to add-erase things (or make it bigger, since it's a vector, resolution is not a problem. instead, in photoshop, it depends on the size you made the paths)

remember: paths =! vector
But you can make the size of your paths bigger. O_o
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
but still it's not the same :3
photoshop: photo editing
illustrator: vector editing
>>758
as soon as you fill your paths with color youre gonna get fucked up
see : http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/8250/testcsfm1.jpg
 
 
Date Mar 2, 2007 User DLS84 Rating Safe Score 30 Hidden 2
geass is banned from moe :|
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
>>719
do you only know how to complain to 4chan?
Give us a moment... trying to restore all the pics...
Most are back from batch import.
>>721
makes more fun there
 
 
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
whats the source of this?
the millions of tags suck. :|

and if thats one of your bad vectors, i wanna see ur good ones ^^
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
There are plenty ones on this board !! :/
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
whoever tried to tag this: The tag separator is space. If you're going to add a tag with spaces in it, replace them with underscores, elsewise you'll just create separate tags (eg "steel", "angel", and "kurumi" instead of "steel angel kurumi").
Retagged to follow the tagging guidelines.
 
Date Mar 31, 2007 User vita Rating Safe Score 18 Hidden 6
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
No, it's 32bit, and I wasn't talking about open areas like you have pointed out. I was looking at the outlines (which is were jpeg artifacts show on most images). Also, I've just been and checked on my other monitor and I still see them.

Anyway, I'm sure if someone else takes a look they can confirm what I've said. Since I know now that it's not just my monitor.
could u marke some critical outlines like i did?
if anything.. this is the original one and the 1.11MB is the re-saved one

i've compared both images with FastStone Image Viewer's compare feature, and this image retains more details while the other one shows signs of a re-save

my monitor is a colour calibrated dell 2405
Anonymous
over 17 years ago
>>356
I could, but there are no 'critical' outlines. All the outlines in both images have artifacts surrounding them. There are just less artifacts in this one. Also, Shadow has just said basically the same thing (thanks for confirming by the way Shadow).
hmmm, i wish i knew the source ....
the minitokyo one is the 1,1mb (since they dont allow pics to be larger than 2mb lol)
im not sure if the animepaper one is 1,1mb only too...
i thought this pic was a resave, too, with some shopped noise+filters or something
no problem SoylentGreen

i appreciate the tendency towards high quality scans, so i'll be hanging around this site more often :)