How many files may I upload at the same time? Also, what's the maximal size that may get uploaded here at all?

Secondly, I saw various tags (these faulty ones). I do not see any FAQs about these, is there a place were I could get a better understanding about them?

Not sure about the maximum concurrent uploads.

What about the fault tags? Do you need to know what they mean?

You can go to the 'Tags' section, put a * in the 'Name' field as a wildcard, click the 'Type' and select Faults. Hit search. This will list the fault tags we use.

I think Feito talks about the definition of each fault tag.

kyoushiro said:
I think Feito talks about the definition of each fault tag.

No FAQs but someone can write a summary.

kyoushiro said:
I think Feito talks about the definition of each fault tag.

This

Also brb 1hr~ gonna make dinner and stuff ^.~

I didn't know evil tsundere spirits know how to cook :o

kyoushiro said:
I didn't know evil tsundere spirits know how to cook :o

Change 'cook' to 'cremate'

I was thinking the other day that Moe doesn't use the wiki feature enough, especially compared to Danbooru, which makes it a little hard for new people to learn how to tag properly sometimes. I'll try to get started writing up a few entries.

Also, would it be possible to get links directly from the tags in the tag listing to the wiki entires?

Radioactive said:
Change 'cook' to 'cremate'

Your so cruel -.-

Aurelia said:
I was thinking the other day that Moe doesn't use the wiki feature enough, especially compared to Danbooru, which makes it a little hard for new people to learn how to tag properly sometimes

I just wanna learn what these tags mean so I can study and learn how to clean up X pic. I understand what "dust" means even though it's not used in photo editing, and some are kinda self-explanatory... But I don't understand for example what "screening", "crease" is or "binding discoloration". Screening is dust/scan artifacts right?....

Feito said:
I just wanna learn what these tags mean so I can study and learn how to clean up X pic. I understand what "dust" means even though it's not used in photo editing, and some are kinda self-explanatory... But I don't understand for example what "screening", "crease" is or "binding discoloration". Screening is dust/scan artifacts right?....

...Nope. I wrote a couple entries on what some of them are, and very generally how to fix them. I don't know how to use Photoshop, SAI, etc., so you'd have to ask petopeto or others.

Someone who actually has scanning/processing experience (I don't) should probably go through my entries and edit them.

Screening - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screening_(printing) If the dots are visible to the naked eye then it gets tagged. If you are not 100% sure then tag it with 'scanning_artifacts' as well

Crease - A bend/crease in the scan.

Binding_discoloration - The scanner hasn't de-binded the artbook. If you can't lay the image perfectly flat on the scanner, you'll get discoloration of the scan.

IMO - the easiest scans to fix with processing are in this order - screening, crease, JPEG artifacts, binding discoloration, scanning artifacts, paper texture, bleed through, gap.

Anyone want to expand on this?

Thanks, this made more sense now :)

Needs the fault tag caused by enhanceing contrast/saturation at the exaggerated degree.
it can't be fixed. horrible :(

[edit]
and overfiltered.
perhaps, those are ones should be deleted without tagging :P

midzki said:
Needs the fault tag caused by enhanceing contrast/saturation at the exaggerated degree.
it can't be fixed. horrible :(

[edit]
and overfiltered.
perhaps, those are ones should be deleted without tagging :P

horrible
Done.
Do we have a bad color fault tag? Or is it just fixme?

edit:
Also, Feito, screening, crease, bleed through, binding discoloration, jpeg artifacts, scanning artifacts, paper texture, watermark, signed, gap, cropme, fixme.
(The documentation on how to use the wiki is ...ugh).

Is there some way we could implement Danbooru's Dtext system as well? Moe seems to be using an earlier version that only works in the comments and the forum, but not the wiki.

Hahahaha, I still laugh @ "horrible".

And here I thought jpeg_artifacts were impossible to fix (yay for lossless \o/) I also suck at fixing screening, so shoot me as i seem to always remove so much detail >.<

Nice job on the wiki entries Aurelia ^^

I want to know "How many files may I upload at the same time" too..

Maybe we need batch upload.. Just upload em one by one is wasting time I think..

fireattack said:
I want to know "How many files may I upload at the same time" too..

I've done at max five simultaneous uploads.

Feito said:
And here I thought jpeg_artifacts were impossible to fix

Anything is fixable as long as you've got the time.

Radioactive said:
I've done at max five simultaneous uploads.

That listens great. But when can we use it? Or this function already existed but I don't find it?

Aurelia said:
horrible
screening, crease, bleed through, binding discoloration, jpeg artifacts, scanning artifacts, paper texture, watermark, signed, gap, cropme, fixme.

I don't recommend photoshopping out signatures on vectors. Unless, of course, the signature really intrudes on the scan.

Watermarks are fair game.

midzki said:
Needs the fault tag caused by enhanceing contrast/saturation at the exaggerated degree.
it can't be fixed. horrible :(

[edit]
and overfiltered.
perhaps, those are ones should be deleted without tagging :P

Something like red_hue blue_hue green_hue?

Overfiltered is a good one.

Radioactive said:
Something like red_hue blue_hue green_hue?

they are usufull info rather than red_eyes blue_eys green_eyes =D

Adjectives are not tags.

blue eyes
red pants
purple hair

>.<

I'll be going and deleting all of these tags cause they are pretty much useless tags. The ones I don't find, are lucky ^^

Radioactive said:
I don't recommend photoshopping out signatures on vectors. Unless, of course, the signature really intrudes on the scan.

Just for the record, I'd have to disagree for vectors which are traces of other people's stuff (which is most of them), for reasons everyone's already heard.

(I don't mind letting the person who vectored it stick his name in an artist tag, though.)

petopeto said:
(I don't mind letting the person who vectored it stick his name in an artist tag, though.)

Wouldn't that be worse? Then there'd be a ton of random vector artist tags on moe making it less organized. If you don't even consider what they do art, then why give it an artist tag?

cheese said:
Wouldn't that be worse? Then there'd be a ton of random vector artist tags on moe making it less organized. If you don't even consider what they do art, then why give it an artist tag?

I agree..giving them an artist tag will just fuel their faggotry more.

Why not just create vector imouto and stick all copycats or should I say "I are original" there?

There's nothing wrong with being able to tell who vectored it, and "put it in a tag" is a much easier sell than "shut up and be totally anonymous". I want to give an alternative, not a stone wall.

It'd be nice to be able to tell whether an artist tag indicates the actual artist or the vector (or wallpaper, etc), but there's really no suitable mechanism for that.

petopeto said:
There's nothing wrong with being able to tell who vectored it, and "put it in a tag" is a much easier sell than "shut up and be totally anonymous". I want to give an alternative, not a stone wall.

It'd be nice to be able to tell whether an artist tag indicates the actual artist or the vector (or wallpaper, etc), but there's really no suitable mechanism for that.

What about creating a new tag type? The system is able to do that dynamically on the config, it would just need a new color in the css.

Feito said:
Why not just create vector imouto and stick all copycats or should I say "I are original" there?

I just need nudeshop imouto =D