Close
Law said:
(3) “Image” does not include an indecent photograph, or indecent pseudo-photograph, of a child.
You're safe for now. The US, however, isn't. They've actually thrown people in jail for possessing anime and manga.

The UK law is more lenient and doesn't also ban anime, manga and loli pics.

If you want to hear more stupidity like this, head to sankakucomplex.com, where you can get all the scoop on UNICEF pressuring Japan to ban all loli or anything even remotely looking like a loli (meaning only milf action left), the Queen of Sweden (one of the most sexually perverse countries on the globe) and UNICEF bashing Japan for it's loli anime and manga as a threat to child security, even though it has the lowest child abuse rate on the globe compared to the high rate of paranoid child haven countries, and how a group of feminists (read: mentally deprived women) had succeeded in forcing a publisher of a rape game (even though the intercourse was virtual and later on consensual) to recall it's game and never sell it again, but not before Amazon and other major retardeilers did it before.

What a wonderful world we live in! :D
Most people who play this kind of games and read this kind of mangas are peaceful and have some intellect. Just because someone is reading MPD Psycho or any other "violent" manga doesn't mean that he or she will start killing everyone they see on streets.
Also, pick the main readers of hentai doujins. Man, they only want "fun" or whatever else, they are not criminals or rapists or anything else like this.

Actually, they should worry about the real mean people.
They don't need any books or games to make them be mean.
Cloud737 said:
.....What a wonderful world we live in! :D
hahahaha you should see my country....in here most of the older population (25) don't even know what a heck is hentai! hahaha...

in here you can't find any doujin store or manga sellers xD....
but there aren't very psychos, killers,rapiest, pedophils and not even homos here too so....it's not very bad to be cuted off from the world a guess, cuz the world itself is sick as we know it....

but I guess as we (my land) progress with living there are much more generations to come so there will be this kind of things in future......

(ah screw it not just older population....even those my age don't know for hentai...well except some of them-4 or 5 I can count in my head maybe xD)
@ Debbie

Tell that to attention-whore, vote-hungry politicians and Jack Thompson. Ahum! :P

But seriously now, I play violent (GTA) video games since I was some age I think, started watching pr0n around that time too, hentai and lolis and whatever came when I was probably around some age. I don't see me raping children or beating a guy dead till his skull cracks.

Actually, some studies have shown that actually simulating those things reduce the number of occurrences in real life (e.g.: the time GTA III launched, the US has seen it's lowest crime rate in centuries, and Japan, known for it's lolies and "child pornography" actually has the lowest child abuse rates on the globe). But then, who the hell pays attention to evidence and reason when you can have prejudices and look important?

@ Wishmaster

Same here. I'm in a developing country too, and we're somewhat cut-off from the rest as well (though we did enter the EU a couple of years ago). I think that's actually good, despite the poor economy and even more shameless and corrupt politicians, since all the s**t the West comes up with from time to time is bound to hit a deaf ear here. We actually joke that the US isn't the promised "land of freedom", THIS IS! You can get away with anything here, even murder. :P

While we also don't have any mangas and hentai here (are there anywhere? even in the US, I think you can not find them being sold anywhere; the Internet is the only resource, except for scarce h-games from time to time), but we still have lots of psychos, killers, rapists, pedophiles and homos, and I think you have too - you just don't hear it that often and often times there will be no media coverage.

Edited for personal details.
This law is now on the statute books so if you are visiting from the UK I would highly recommend you do not disable any blacklists.

Mods - Please make sure that any loli and extreme_content images are correctly rated, and tagged.
doh! i clicked on that link at the beginning, is that bad for me now? -.-
R4nd0M said:
doh! i clicked on that link at the beginning, is that bad for me now? -.-
Yes. The ministry of 'truth' has your IP address.
Radioactive said:
Yes. The ministry of 'truth' has your IP address.
LOLOLOL, I clicked it too. I guess I'm effed.
Don't forget, ignorance of the law doesn't exempt you from them.
Pffft. Tough situation.
Good luck to all UK people...
Hmm so if I draw a stick figure and it doing sexual acts to another stick figure and say they're under 18 = jail?
admin2 said:
Hmm so if I draw a stick figure and it doing sexual acts to another stick figure and say they're under 18 = jail?
Damn straight.
This sort of law quickly falls into absurdity.
Taking things literally, one could say "You just drew those stick figures - they're really only a few seconds old!"
And what about catgirls? How quickly do they age? 18 in human years is 88 in cat years - do catgirls fall somewhere in between? Maybe we need to commission a study on the life cycle of catgirls.
The lesson? Trying to apply the laws of reality to fiction is futile, and you will almost surely make yourself look foolish in the process.
Is there some reason why UK is making these types of laws?

Did a lot of people under the age of 18 get raped constantly for them to create these types of laws?

It's only fictional drawing...right?
Or did some humans get so desperate (and stupid) and start to do the things they see in fictional arts that makes countries make such laws?
admin2 said:
Hmm so if I draw a stick figure and it doing sexual acts to another stick figure and say they're under 18 = jail?
Until it has been tested in the courts I can't answer that.

You need to watch out for these:

(2) A prohibited image is an image which—

(a) is pornographic,

(b) falls within subsection (6), and

(c) is grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character

(3) An image is “pornographic” if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal.
For laws intended to not cause harm to a weaker group in society they are too broad. Let's hope the EU proposed singular stance on CP keeps that in mind and doesn't just hack and slash around in broad strokes like this.
Radioactive said:
Until it has been tested in the courts I can't answer that.

You need to watch out for these:

(2) A prohibited image is an image which—

(a) is pornographic,

(b) falls within subsection (6), and

(c) is grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character

(3) An image is “pornographic” if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal.
how can they make such a law? You'd first have to define what makes an image porn. Sexual acts? What is considered a sexual act exactly?
What is grossly offensive? Something that another guy would find grossly offensive, another guy could find it really nice.
Produced to purpose sexual arousal? What if it was made just because the artist felt like it? The greatest thing about being an artist is the fact that NOBODY can tell you what you can do and what you can't do. This kind of law is against the artists freedom
AZD-A9S said:
Is there some reason why UK is making these types of laws?
It's only fictional drawing...right?
van said:
This sort of law quickly falls into absurdity.
The lesson? Trying to apply the laws of reality to fiction is futile, and you will almost surely make yourself look foolish in the process.
Seems like UK enjoys creating non-sense rules. They should be worried better with the well-fare of the population than with hentai and loli stuff. Or is it that dangerous? OH my God, he's seeing a hentai picture! OMG stop him or he will kill someone!

Azarel said:
What is grossly offensive? What if it was made just because the artist felt like it? The greatest thing about being an artist is the fact that NOBODY can tell you what you can do and what you can't do. This kind of law is against the artists freedom
Now you talked sweet. Surely everybody here agrees with you, Azarel. I thought we finally had freedom,at least of expression, nowadays...

Radioactive said:
An image is “pornographic” if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal.
Urotan doujins were created with that purpose. But I don't use them with this purpose. Therefore, they are not pornographic to me, and can't be forbidden to people who uses them the same way I do. So what if someone wants to have that kind of product? Who can tell if they will use that to sexual arousal, or not? Laws can't tell that. Porn doesn't hurt anyone. And there is not a single reason to prohibit it.
And this thread Returns! From! Beyond! the! Grave!

The Digital Economy Bill rears its head - http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/porn-websites-sites-pages-videos-internet-adult-uk-digital-economy-bill-a7433551.html

Anyone want to take over my job ;-)
Radioactive said:
And this thread Returns! From! Beyond! the! Grave!

The Digital Economy Bill rears its head - http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/porn-websites-sites-pages-videos-internet-adult-uk-digital-economy-bill-a7433551.html

Anyone want to take over my job ;-)
didn't even know you were from the UK to begin with. What a terrible world. :L
radio no nobody can take your place
Didn't expect this showing on the forum's front page again.
So sorry for you Radioactive.

It sucks.
Radioactive said:
Damn... This really is a thing in UK, isn't it?

AZD-A9S said:

Things are gradually getting worse in this era / generation. More censorship / alteration in games, SJWs, some people rioting because their candidate didn't win, etc.
But on the other hand people who are against the oversensitive pampering are also getting more vocal about it.
I think SJWs will start to lose ground again in the near future as their movement has little to no actual substance beyond their 'emotions'.

Also, the fact 'their' candidate didn't win to begin with, despite how vocal and confident they were, shows there's actually a huge amount of otherwise 'silent' people that do disagree with them and are willing to voice it. spoiler

_____________

In general I am positive that this 'SJW' investment will not become a lasting thing as long as the internet will stay openly available so that people can inform themselves and widen their horizons and SJWs thus can't use their 'appeal to emotions' tactics in local media effectively.
Kawaiideath said:
See Above.
I really hope certain things will die down / disappear so things can be more "peaceful".
Lol censorship was everywhere, but still uncensored version still exist
AZD-A9S said:
It sucks.
>>>>>please dont fucking lump people who are politically active with this stupid kind of censorship. please<<<<<.

what the hell, im so disappointed when ppl despise """"sjw"""" and defend conservative governments in which everything remains the same unfair elitist racist sexist xenophobe queerphobe crude and hypocritical shit as ever. hypocritical is a good word to sum up the right wing. they say respect, freedom, justice is right, obviously because they want to look correct and show they are correct and reasonable. but in fact what they do and what happens is entirely else. its disrespectful, oppressive and extremely unfair, especially with the poor and minorities. but they pretend not to see it. they pretend this is not reality. they say as if everything were okay being the way they are now and keeping it like that is the best way to get a "better life for everyone" (when theres obviously countless fucked up unfairness and shits in the world that needs direct action to be solved). so when we point out the shit that happens in this world, the poverty, the persecution, the violence, the total abandonement of people by the government and enterprises, the political, economical, organizational corruption, we are labeled as crazy and radicals. dirty play. being a conservative is so 18th century. why hadnt human race got a grip already? ignoring our problems and our neighbors problems wont make them disappear. oh but once you have your cute house your food your little luxuries and your money who cares about the ppl who couldnt study, who doesnt have a roof, doesnt have food or water, who overwork themselves because they do not have any other choice to survive, who sell their bodies, who are abused by relatives and lovers, doesnt have any dignity. let the banks fuck us and make billions without actually producing any concrete thing to society (unlike a food industry for an example). yeah its so right and fair. like trump destroying obamacare and giving all the money previously directed to help poor people to get medical care (something any human being needs and deserves) to banks. oh yeah omfg brilliant, what a fucking genius, the new nelson mandela, give that man a nobel, omfg such decency, such fairness, perfect, this is what the people living in usa needs. who needs health care? we need the banks to get richer, obviously our lives will be much better if their billionaire liquid incomes grew even bigger. we would be so much benefited by it.

long and annoying post but hell i think those things should be said here by anyone irly frustrated im the first and only one to point this out
Debbie, don't troll people in here.
Uh Debbie? That's one huge text wall there.

It would really help for the reader if you use paragraphs short to medium size to make your opinions / thoughts better to read.
AZD-A9S said:
Is there some reason why UK is making these types of laws?
Because some people are full of ignorance and fear, which brew into hate. They have an opinion first and look for facts to back it up later. They don't like what some people like, and instinctively want to make them extinct. More conveniently, you don't really need any scientific fact to make a law, and the target of the law is minority enough.

Sadly, this might be deep inside human nature, which is the mere result of evolution.
It's all about control. Always has been, and always will be.