no comment any more?
1) add lowres=mpixels:<1.92 -flash
2) suggest users to use -lowres when they're murmuring about resolution.
3) recommend users not to upload many (e.x. over 1 page) lowres digitals in a day.
1) add lowres=mpixels:<1.92 -flash
2) suggest users to use -lowres when they're murmuring about resolution.
3) recommend users not to upload many (e.x. over 1 page) lowres digitals in a day.
And if they disobey that?midzki said:
no comment any more?
1) add lowres=mpixels:<1.92 -flash
2) suggest users to use -lowres when they're murmuring about resolution.
3) recommend users not to upload many (e.x. over 1 page) lowres in a day.
no rules include in above statement.
Just asking for personal opinion.
EDIT:
(Below)
Alright.
EDIT:
(Below)
Alright.
my personal opinion..
disobeying is their will. but they'll get responsibility to explain their righteousness to disobey instead.
(in before, it was just a suggestion. not a thing obey or disobey)
disobeying is their will. but they'll get responsibility to explain their righteousness to disobey instead.
(in before, it was just a suggestion. not a thing obey or disobey)
Sounds good to me.midzki said:
1) add lowres=mpixels:<1.92 -flash
2) suggest users to use -lowres when they're murmuring about resolution.
3) recommend users not to upload many (e.x. over 1 page) lowres digitals in a day.
If they persistently ignore this 'recommendation' then we can take further action.midzki said:
disobeying is their will. but they'll get responsibility to explain their righteousness to disobey instead.
I'd also suggest not to upload following lowres contents:
1) photoshop, vector_trace, screen_cap, unoffical (photoshopped) wallpaper
2) minor variations derived from a single drawing.
3) highy deformed styles away from moe/anime style (photo realistic style is an exception).
the aim of 3) is to make judge the art quality clearly. (even I know it kills possibility of some high-quality drawings)
1) photoshop, vector_trace, screen_cap, unoffical (photoshopped) wallpaper
2) minor variations derived from a single drawing.
3) highy deformed styles away from moe/anime style (photo realistic style is an exception).
the aim of 3) is to make judge the art quality clearly. (even I know it kills possibility of some high-quality drawings)
Can you give some examples of 3) that we have onsite?
I see nothing wrong with nihonga
That's so out of date it's ridiculous. We were working on a new terms_of_service but that hasn't progressed recently.midzki said:
I listed because of that ToS. noone think it's anime-related
(I personally don't mind whether it's right or wrong)
We let male and mecha in. Still don't see what the problem is with allowing nihonga in?
The ones I've posted aren't just traditional Japanese-style paintings but are influenced heavily by this 'style' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihonga)
ff.. it seems just a random example raised a new subject.
I don't have a strong opinion about allowable contents, since whether they are allowed or disallowed, nothing effects on me in the use of this site.
I don't have a strong opinion about allowable contents, since whether they are allowed or disallowed, nothing effects on me in the use of this site.
It's a discussion that needs to be held elsewhere. I'll move on.
"Who'd search for it, to begin with." That's my question. Yes there may be a few, but excluding those for the sake of my example. It'd be like a rotting grocery waiting it time to be thrown out.
You know my opinion on the worthless tags we use. Let's not get too bogged down with this.
The most important thing we need is the artist/circle tag.
The most important thing we need is the artist/circle tag.
Radioactive
Is there a consensus on megapixel size?