Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
fireattack said: I won't bother to be honest. It's relatively easy to find the magazine name, but is it really worth pooling? There are only a few of pages of them.
Radioactive said: 16 pages is quite a lot.
And the page number is 114, which means this collection of sengoku bushouki muramasa is just a little part of the whole magazine.
I have a strong dislike to the real rules not being written down. The terms of service are clearly written, and should either be followed or changed. Whether the "well, it's OK for completion if it's in a pool even though it's not really in a pool" exception applies to the other "prohibited" content is something that should be spelled out clearly.
And while I don't particularly care about this image, if this is going to be allowed to stay, there should be a furry tag so it's clearly marked and people have the option to blacklist it and future applications of the same exception.
Radioactive said: We 10s of thousands of images here and we have, what, 1 furry image? Fairly low on my list of things to worry about.
true. i think it would be really disappointing not to have the entire artbook on the site. i mean, whats the point of taking off 1 or 2 images from the entire pool just because it makes u offended. theres so much really atrocious and actually offensive pictures here with extreme content violence pedophilia monsters sexism etc actually most of the r:q and r:e are pure objectification of women and kids i think deleting 1 picture from a pool because its a furry is kinda ridiculous and hypocrite. these rules arent laws, they are just guidelines so the site doesnt lose its focus/purpose. -in my opinion- of course.
well if furries bother u so much go ahead and create and maintain the tag i guess. who knows in the next years it might happen again. life is full of wonders.
Debbie said: well if furries bother u so much go ahead and create and maintain the tag i guess. who knows in the next years it might happen again. life is full of wonders.
moonian
over 8 years agoRadioactive
over 8 years agoKawaiideath
over 8 years agopfeil
over 8 years agonphuongsun93
over 8 years agoRadioactive
over 8 years agomoonian
over 8 years agoRadioactive
over 8 years agomoonian
over 8 years agoJust hope drop can provide the magazine's title so that they can be added to a pool...
fireattack
over 8 years agoRadioactive
over 8 years agomoonian
over 8 years agopfeil
over 8 years agoAnd while I don't particularly care about this image, if this is going to be allowed to stay, there should be a furry tag so it's clearly marked and people have the option to blacklist it and future applications of the same exception.
Radioactive
over 8 years agoDebbie
over 8 years agowell if furries bother u so much go ahead and create and maintain the tag i guess. who knows in the next years it might happen again. life is full of wonders.
Radioactive
over 8 years agoDebbie
over 8 years ago