Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Date Apr 9, 2007UserGipFaceRating QuestionableScore41Hidden1
MDGeist, your raws were crappy quality and were subsequently very very quickly deleted. We can see the quality and we're pretty picky about it as you might as well know, so please refrain from wasting our time. Besides, don't you have some 4chan trolling to do?
PS is often used for fixed sized images (read : Wallpaper) though.
However enlarging your hours of work in PS to a size of lets say >>630 is NOT possible... You had to start at that size , which will most likely kill your memory ^^
no read above: you can make vectors in photoshop but you can only save the paths. it's not the same, since you cannot use the vector in case you need to add-erase things (or make it bigger, since it's a vector, resolution is not a problem. instead, in photoshop, it depends on the size you made the paths)
whoever tried to tag this: The tag separator is space. If you're going to add a tag with spaces in it, replace them with underscores, elsewise you'll just create separate tags (eg "steel", "angel", and "kurumi" instead of "steel angel kurumi").
No, it's 32bit, and I wasn't talking about open areas like you have pointed out. I was looking at the outlines (which is were jpeg artifacts show on most images). Also, I've just been and checked on my other monitor and I still see them.
Anyway, I'm sure if someone else takes a look they can confirm what I've said. Since I know now that it's not just my monitor.
if anything.. this is the original one and the 1.11MB is the re-saved one
i've compared both images with FastStone Image Viewer's compare feature, and this image retains more details while the other one shows signs of a re-save
>>356 I could, but there are no 'critical' outlines. All the outlines in both images have artifacts surrounding them. There are just less artifacts in this one. Also, Shadow has just said basically the same thing (thanks for confirming by the way Shadow).
hmmm, i wish i knew the source .... the minitokyo one is the 1,1mb (since they dont allow pics to be larger than 2mb lol) im not sure if the animepaper one is 1,1mb only too... i thought this pic was a resave, too, with some shopped noise+filters or something
Anonymous
about 17 years agowaha
about 17 years agoRequest denied
Anonymous
about 17 years agocoldfire724
almost 17 years agoMDGeist
almost 17 years agomahouneko
almost 17 years agoAnonymous
almost 17 years agoAnonymous
almost 17 years agoadmin2
almost 17 years agoAnonymous
almost 17 years agoadmin2
almost 17 years agoAnonymous
almost 17 years agoMDGeist
almost 17 years agoAnonymous
almost 17 years agoAnonymous
almost 17 years agoAnonymous
almost 17 years agoAnonymous
almost 17 years agoi will upload one explicit image.
Kanze
almost 17 years agowill upload rest of decent image, pardon my slow upload speed
some of the image are based on anime series i think, cause i saw shuffle in one of them
Anonymous
about 17 years agoMDGeist
about 17 years agoAnonymous
about 17 years agoAnonymous
about 17 years ago7443 x 5254 doesnt seem that bad, considering this 1831er version is just a resize...
Anonymous
about 17 years agoAnonymous
about 17 years agoMDGeist
about 17 years agoHowever enlarging your hours of work in PS to a size of lets say >>630 is NOT possible...
You had to start at that size , which will most likely kill your memory ^^
Nookadum
about 17 years agoYou can make vectorized shape layers in Photoshop (Pen Tool), it's just not as powerful as in Illustrator.
Anonymous
about 17 years agoread above: you can make vectors in photoshop but you can only save the paths. it's not the same, since you cannot use the vector in case you need to add-erase things (or make it bigger, since it's a vector, resolution is not a problem. instead, in photoshop, it depends on the size you made the paths)
remember: paths =! vector
Nookadum
about 17 years agoAnonymous
about 17 years agophotoshop: photo editing
illustrator: vector editing
MDGeist
about 17 years agoas soon as you fill your paths with color youre gonna get fucked up
see : http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/8250/testcsfm1.jpg
MDGeist
about 17 years agoAnonymous
about 17 years agodo you only know how to complain to 4chan?
Nookadum
about 17 years agoadmin2
about 17 years agoMDGeist
about 17 years agoMDGeist
about 17 years agomakes more fun there
Anonymous
about 17 years agothe millions of tags suck. :|
and if thats one of your bad vectors, i wanna see ur good ones ^^
Anonymous
about 17 years agoShadowVlican
about 17 years agohttp://anidb.info/perl-bin/animedb.pl?show=anime&aid=88
someone edit the tags as u see fit
Anonymous
about 17 years agoShadowVlican
about 17 years agowaha
about 17 years agoAnonymous
over 17 years agoAnyway, I'm sure if someone else takes a look they can confirm what I've said. Since I know now that it's not just my monitor.
MDGeist
over 17 years agoShadowVlican
over 17 years agoi've compared both images with FastStone Image Viewer's compare feature, and this image retains more details while the other one shows signs of a re-save
my monitor is a colour calibrated dell 2405
Anonymous
over 17 years agoI could, but there are no 'critical' outlines. All the outlines in both images have artifacts surrounding them. There are just less artifacts in this one. Also, Shadow has just said basically the same thing (thanks for confirming by the way Shadow).
MDGeist
over 17 years agothe minitokyo one is the 1,1mb (since they dont allow pics to be larger than 2mb lol)
im not sure if the animepaper one is 1,1mb only too...
i thought this pic was a resave, too, with some shopped noise+filters or something
ShadowVlican
over 17 years agoi appreciate the tendency towards high quality scans, so i'll be hanging around this site more often :)