Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
MirrorMagpie said: Why either/or? How about both? To be accepted here, an image must be high quality *and* high resolution. This site doesn't (nor do I think it should) archive the internet, it just takes the cream of the crop.
That's what we've been doing and so far it's gone pretty good, imo.
Aurelia said: Let's wait a bit and discuss this first. I don't have a full opinion/solution yet, but I don't think either option is the way to go.
The "2 megapixels" thing I wrote is rough. Stuff like post #29019 is under 2 mpixels, but even though it is a bit small to me, I wouldn't consider it low res.
I don't think it'd be very productive to go vigilante on old stuff and do a mass delete, except the most egregious ones. If we were to make 2 mpixels a hard and fast rule, more people would start upscaling or do some form of pixel stuffing.
Edit: haha, it looks like a lot of people wrote things since I started writing this post.
I've always given very high leniency on our older posts. I'm probably gonna stick to that too.
aoie_emesai
I've always given very high leniency on our older posts. I'm probably gonna stick to that too.