Shizashi said:
Is it just me, or is feet kinda pointless?

No, feet is fine. ass_grab is pointless.

Cause I like nickpicking on the tags I see everyday, i have these on my continually growing list.

• wedding_dress
• anal
• dildo
• vibrator
• police_uniform
• ninja
• uniform - this works as a general tag, but it's too vague imo, even with an alias, this tag will be pointless at the end,
• handjob
• gangbang

• watercolor this should be categorized into art or something like that.

• stockings should be aliased to thighhighs as they are basically the same.

blooregardo said:
No, feet is fine. ass_grab is pointless.

That is pointless to me too.

I thought anal was a blacklist tag. While it is not actually in my blacklist I will generally avoid any tagged it.

I've used ninja, in fact it was quite useful, google completely failed to give me any decent images for that search (I had to hunt high and low to get an un-MSpaint edited version of one image). Ninjas are different to the plethora of other images that they'd get lost in if you were to rely on clothing/weapon tags.

Uniform probably came from some q/e post originally. It has to be general, because only seifuku has reason to be it's own tag.

I never did get the feet fetish. (which is even more so the likely origin of the tag)

Why do you want to remove some dress tags such as sedding_dress, ninjia & police_uniform?

I voted to keep all of them except stockings (which can be merged into thighhighs).

• wedding_dress Leave this one, it shows up often.
• anal, handjob, gangbang blacklist tags, leave them
• dildo, vibrator could just be sex_toys or something
• police_uniform could go with uniform, if uniform is given a more specific definition.
• ninja I'm ambivalent on this one, leaning towards delete.

• watercolor In favor of dropping this one. It's getting harder to tell real watercolors from digitally painted ones in the same style.

• stockings/thighhighs In favor of merging for several monnths.

Yeah i was thinking the same about aliasing them to sex_toys but sadly I doubt anyone would use that tag...

aoie_emesai said:
Yeah i was thinking the same about aliasing them to sex_toys but sadly I doubt anyone would use that tag...

then we can just remove them?

Azarel said:
then we can just remove them?

I meant as in searching for the tag sex_toys not didlo and vibrator.

soccer ?

I see no reason to have specific sport tags.
We all know the only ones people are going to try regularly are volleyball, beach_ball and maybe tennis.

I'd merge them into sports

pasties Is this necessary? Can't it be considered bandages?

I didn't know there was such a tag, but it would really be bandages and/or maebari (and possibly bandaid).

SciFi said:
I didn't know there was such a tag, but it would really be bandages and/or maebari (and possibly bandaid).

No, pasties=nipple_cover which we used before.

And about bandages.. it's only one of many things which can cover the nipples. :P (And it can be used in a lot of ways)

I don't understand the reasoning of needing pasties and maebari. While trying to keep the tags useful and informative, we should keep them organized and well-kept. While we allow exemptions for some, we keep allowing others to be created when we can have a universal tag that can be used to identify it already.

Pasties and maebari aren't the same thing. Same function of covering "intimate parts", but they're on different parts of the body and I think maebari is a Japanese sort of idea, while pasties are more universal.

To continue on my rant. enema Is this needed? I just want to clarify this before our 7 already tagged ones goes out of control.

O_oSeriously, that's all I can say to the idea that someone would use that tag

aoie_emesai said:
To continue on my rant. enema Is this needed? I just want to clarify this before our 7 already tagged ones goes out of control.

nobody seems to be against deleting it so I think it's not needed

Feet , other than complaining about the tag this time, after looking at the tag and doing some comparison, its a foot fetish tag. But looking at the first few samples; how exactly are we going about tagging them as such?

post #147467 - this is what i'd consider a good example of the foot tag but something like:

post #146798
&
post #138995

are rather bad examples on how i'd try to present this tag. What kind of tag are we using it for? Whenever a foot/feet is present?

IMO the presence of a foot shouldn't garner the use of the tag. The foot/feet should be prominent, just as described in the wiki.

Someone needs to go through and review the feet tags.

Aurelia said:
pantaloons has been aliased to bloomers. You can try searching for the underwear-ish type by doing something like bloomers -gym_uniform or in conjunction with lolita_fashion.

A bit late.. but I don't think it's a good idea whenever I search it. Maybe pantaloons isn't a clear word to describe these costumes, but they're obviously different from sport burumas. Thus even just delete this tag (gym_uniform is enough basically) is better than merge it with bloomers mechanically. It makes the result of bloomers very pointless IMO.

remove vector and replace with trace, or at least vector_trace :P
because there are many original semi-vectors and traced semi-rasters with developed paint tools.

midzki said:
remove vector and replace with vector_trace

I concur. Replacing extraction with transparent_png wouldn't be a bad idea either.

alias replaced with vector and vector_trace. I excluded full_raster_trace from them, but when you find it, I'd suggest to add photoshop instead (they're very few)

Lua said:
I concur. Replacing extraction with transparent_png wouldn't be a bad idea either.

how about just transparent?

Agreed: Replace vector with vector_trace and extraction with transparent.

midzki said:
alias replaced with vector and vector_trace. I excluded full_raster_trace from them, but when you find it, I'd suggest to add photoshop instead (they're very few)

how about just transparent?

Transparent seems a bit vague, imo

Just transparent is kinda vague, I'd think it applied to clothing sooner than extractions. transparent_png, or transparent_background would be more clear.

fireattack said:
A bit late.. but I don't think it's a good idea whenever I search it. Maybe pantaloons isn't a clear word to describe these costumes, but they're obviously different from sport burumas. Thus even just delete this tag (gym_uniform is enough basically) is better than merge it with bloomers mechanically. It makes the result of bloomers very pointless IMO.

Agreed, bloomers and pantaloons were vastly different things and shouldn't have been merged...maybe just change bloomers into buruma and leave pantaloons as pantaloons like how it is in danbooru?