Hmm people will search for it IM person exp. as a lot have that fetish towards loli's.. ( referring to the US here ) maybe pantaloons should be aliased to dress if at all. Makes it easier.

I personally find pantaloons to be a descriptive term - I would anticipate it to be used when someone finds a post they like and sees the list of tags and wants to find more similar images. However I would say that it has about a 75% correlation with lolita_fashion - which is usually my starting point for these types of searches. It also has some overlap with maid.

As for maintenance - yeah call it a fetish if you want :) But I do search for images with that feature quite frequently - consider it the "safe" version of pantsu if you will - so I'd be willing to maintain.

As for safe vs. questionable - what is the guideline? I was going by "not safe for work" sort of idea. In my mind (and if I'm in the minority I'll gladly conform). A great example - anything tagged pantsu is not "safe" - along with some other terms, but that's the biggest one I saw. Pantsu rating:s should return nothing. Another example with fewer offenders: nipples rating:s should return nothing.

If they agree, can the admins can globally change this? It would be helpful when I'm at work and want to pull up something to show someone.

Here are a few examples from pantsu rating:s - definitely not work safe - though I love that first one... I updated them to questionable as long as I had them up.

post #113016
post #114283
post #108398

Overall, we try to go by the guidelines but overall most images are bordering questionable / safe. From there it's all from a perspective of the individual user.

howto:rate

Simply use that as a basis of your ratings and expand upon it.

Very few can notice the existence of wiki (-ω-)

If safemoe ever happens we should strip off the non-essential tags. That'll work for me.

Bakaneko, I think what you're calling "pantaloons" are closer to "bloomers" (but we also have the gym uniform buruma covered in it). I always had the impression that pantaloons were just...pants. bloore also pointed out to me these types of bloomers could probably be covered by lingerie.

Panties in rating:s are okay, if it's just a little bit and there's no cameltoe. If you don't want to see it, just blacklist rating:s pantsu, which is actually what I have done. There are a lot of things that are borderline and interpretation varies between us, but I don't have time to go through all the posts and re-rate them like I used to.

Pantaloons are generally worn in place of pantsu - at least historically, so I'd think lingerie is more accurate than bloomers, but I don't know that it would get the desired results. I've just been using lolita_fashion where appropriate, which is most of the time anyway.

The problem is that what I want to see depends on where I am ;) If I do a search for lolita_fashion - I generally don't blacklist any ratings, but if in some company I may want to do lolita_fashion rating:s - which tends to bring up some slightly questionable images.

I agree - not all pantsu is rating:q - depends on whether it's the focal point, or what is happening in the pictures, etc. If you can see it in the Sears catalog (for those of you who know what that is) it's probalby rating:s, but if it would push an anime to the TV-14 rating, I'd call it rating:q

Option 3 bloomers, the long ones, are described as generally knee length. But did become shorter.
I don't know where the idea that Pantaloons look like that came from. Pantaloons are ankle length trousers, origin: French Revolution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trouser#Men.27s_trousers

pantaloons has been aliased to bloomers. You can try searching for the underwear-ish type by doing something like bloomers -gym_uniform or in conjunction with lolita_fashion.

bloomers lolita_fashion

um... there are skirted bloomers which was used in most gothic lolita fashion... the kind that shinku wears...

and... there's these unskirted version used for athletic use... the kind that baseball players wear...

but japanese unskirted athletic bloomers are different since they are gym shorts... while the original unskirted bloomers are also long and puffy also known as knickerbockers...

now... pantaloons or pantalons are pants(americanized)... pants as in trousers... not the one people here tags as "pantsu" (which i recently learned... i think...)

So basically they are bloomers? Getting technical in terminology of similar descriptive item means the same.

i guess so...

wait... which is which were you talking about? just the bloomers?

or the pantaloons?...

if you ask me... just call the gym shorts as buruma... since it is japanese...

and the one shinku wears as bloomers...

pantaloons is an old term for pants... the trousers...

not pantsu... (which is a very different thing...)

pantaloons of course :)

Aurelia said:
pantaloons has been aliased to bloomers. You can try searching for the underwear-ish type by doing something like bloomers -gym_uniform or in conjunction with lolita_fashion.

Either way, this issue has been solved, so Aoie out.

oh... i see...

Yes, I think now it's a clear as wet pantaloons.. err bloomers ;)

bakanekobakanekobakanekobaaaakaaaa...

just kidding...

SOo... I know a while ago we started discussing about the fixme tag but I don't we made a conclusive decision on the purpose of this tag when we have more than enough fault tags to identify each fault needed to be repaired.

Lets once go ahead and continue this.

Even according to forum #2018, we didn't get much decision making done.

Looked through all the related threads and post and currently nothing.

Unlocked.
There are huge difference between now and 1.2 years ago about image editing σ(ﾟｰ^*)

About fixme, I want to keep it. It's just a catch-all tag for the all of the fault tags. If you're looking for things that need fixing, you can just search one tag instead of having to search all of the others.

Perhaps we should implicate fixme with all the fault tags?

IMO if it has a fault tag it needs fixing.

Radioactive said:
Perhaps we should implicate fixme with all the fault tags?

IMO if it has a fault tag it needs fixing.

We have images which have a fixed parent and the ones which cannot be fix.

fireattack said:
We have images which have a fixed parent and the ones which cannot be fix.

The quality of a 'fix' is subjective, so I see no reason to exclude child scans of fixed images.

Ones that cannot be fixed? Can you link me to some of these please?

I'm using fixme for images I wanna get fixed, and can be fixed with estimated techniques.
never add it on crap scans no value to be fixed.

Radioactive said:
Perhaps we should implicate fixme with all the fault tags?

IMO if it has a fault tag it needs fixing.

That's about on the line of thinking I was on too. Though we almost do the same thing about now, we should go ahead and try to do that.

scanning_artifacts, jpeg_artifacts, binding_discoloration, overfiltered, upscaled, bleed through, some of color_issue (clipped) and some of screening (turned into moire) are just wrong. they should be replaced with new scans not fix them.
i'd rather to add them don'tfixme (ﾟ∀ﾟ)ｱﾋｬ ｱﾋｬﾋｬ

anal_beads?

Do we need all the sex toy tags?

Radioactive said:
anal_beads?

Do we need all the sex toy tags?

They're good for blacklisting :)

Radioactive said:
anal_beads?

Do we need all the sex toy tags?

I never quite worked out the whole vibrator dildo thing - It's a game of "find the batteries" half the time. You might as well go more general on the lot and avoid the hassle completely.