why is it flagged? It's says "too excesive...too loli " but it doesn't make any sense. Lolis are here to stay, even the excessive ones

Unflagged, any objection is welcome.

I thought we had a no toddlercon rule?

This is sick. Even for loli.

I agree with the previous comment, this goes straight past the already highly questionable lolicon and into the darkest, most vile depths of paedophilia.

I also agree. I can excuse naked drawings of little girls. I can excuse naked drawings of little girls having sex.

this, on the other hand, is disgusting and makes feel like a complete pedophile.

... I hope you guys are being sarcastic... it's always hard to tell in the internet

Azarel said:
... I hope you guys are being sarcastic... it's always hard to tell in the internet

I hope they are. Including the one above yours...

On the off chance they're not being sarcastic, it's hard to see how this could be considered worse than slightly older lolis actually having sex. Nudity is much less extreme than sexual content. Beyond the nudity I don't really get any sexual vibes from this image. (Or maybe I'm just not perverted enough to.) （￣～￣;）

Anyway, I don't see anything wrong with it, if there was actual sexual content that'd be different.

Manabi said:
Anyway, I don't see anything wrong with it, if there was actual sexual content that'd be different.

You don't see anything wrong with taking the pants off a 5 year old? I mean, if you are into 10 - 16 year olds (and i assume we all are), whatever, im not going to judge. At least they are going through puberty, looking at pron and know what sex is.

But drawing a person taking the pants off girls who look 3 - 8 is wrong on so many levels. I mean, why even think about messing with kids at that age? Let them be happy and carefree with their pokemon and princesses because growing up can be a bitch.

tktk123 said:
You don't see anything wrong with taking the pants off a 5 year old? I mean, if you are into 10 - 16 year olds (and i assume we all are), whatever, im not going to judge. At least they are going through puberty, looking at pron and know what sex is.

Err no, I don't, sometimes 5yos need help going to the bathroom still (just ask any kindergarten teacher, or anyone who's babysat kids that age), so someone needing to help them change clothes wouldn't be out of the question.

tktk123 said:
But drawing a person taking the pants off girls who look 3 - 8 is wrong on so many levels. I mean, why even think about messing with kids at that age? Let them be happy and carefree with their pokemon and princesses because growing up can be a bitch.

Err, you're not going to like this, but it has to be said. The problem here is not the image. It's your interpretation of what's happening. I see no sexual content here. You're assuming that someone's taking her pants off to do sexual stuff with her. Even if the image is removed it will not change the fact your personal interpretation is more vile than anything actually depicted in the image.

Trying not to be too mean with how I say this, but frankly you're quite a bit more disturbing than the image. WTF is wrong with you to look at this image and instantly think about sex? ∑(O_O；) I sure as hell didn't, and I'm an admitted lolicon and pervert. （￣～￣;）

Manabi said:
Err no, I don't, sometimes 5yos need help going to the bathroom still (just ask any kindergarten teacher, or anyone who's babysat kids that age), so someone needing to help them change clothes wouldn't be out of the question.

That's what I was thinking when I saw this image.

True, it is completely possible that there is nothing sexual with going on with this image. For all I know, this is actually a picture of a lvl.100 ditto in disguise, and this conversation is completely irrelevant because who gives a dam about naked pokemon.

However. if this image were really just a person helping a child change clothes, why would the artist bother exposing the girl's pussy and nipples in full view of the audience? Why that specific camera angle where we only see the babysitter's hand? Clearly the artist is drawing this scene for the the sake of drawing a 5 year old partially naked. There is no denying that the artist's intent is less than innocent. It's even tagged loli and rated e because everyone knows the intention is to portray a young girl in an erotic way.

It is easy to attack me as a person and say that im am disturbed for seeing the image sexually. But it really doesnt matter if that hand belongs to a mother or a rapist. It doesn't change the fact that the author meant to portray this 5 - 8 year old sexually . As I said before, leave the kids out of this, and go fap to someone more age appropriate.

Thought about writing more, but it'll just keep the argument going. I know from experience that the anti-lolicon zealots won't listen to anything, they're right and anyone who disagrees with them is wrong, period.. I'll just say this: if you don't like this type of image you should be blacklisting the loli tag. That's what it's there for. While I don't particularly care for this image (the art just ain't that great), I don't want it censored simply because some people imagine things that aren't there. We have blacklist tags, if they aren't used it's the user's own damn fault they're seeing stuff they dislike. There's plenty of stuff on here I don't like, but I have it blacklisted. I don't try to insist it's censored just because I don't like it.

I'll state for the record again that I see absolutely nothing sexually suggestive about this image. It shouldn't be deleted because some people have warped imaginations and see stuff that isn't there. If we did that, well, there wouldn't be much art left on oreno.imouto now would there?

It's really no big deal. And you are right, if I i dont like it, i can always not look at it, so i am really in no position to complain.

But I dont understand how you can see nothing sexually suggestive in this? Isn't "sexually suggestive cute, young girl" the very definition of loli?

Why?

This should have been filtered about three times over for me, but the filters failed as they often do on the first page I load in a visit, so it displayed anyway ...

SEXY.

What is it that bothers people so much about lolicon? I just can't view lolicon as paedophilia. I don't really fancy lolicon, but whatever floats your boat...I'll put it simply, Lolis don't act like real children, nor look like them. Hentai has been /proven/ to /lessen/ somebody's want to have sex with a real person...Put 2 and 2 together for me here. People who like lolicon shouldn't be prejudiced against, into "disgusting paedofiles!". You could argue "WELL LOLICON IS DIFFERENT BECAUSE IT TAKES AWAY CHILDREN'S INNOCENCE!!!111". Think of it, doesn't sex in general child or not, take away some sort of "innocence" from everyone? Just because this picture bothers you, it doesn't mean you should pester people about there fetishes (As strange as they may be), and flag it. Everyone has their own thing, and none of you are in position to say against it. It's like if somebody who liked lolicon went on a picture of an 18 year old girl and said "THIS IS IMMORAL, SIMPLY BECAUSE THIS IS NOT MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE. PLUS IT'S TAKING AWAY THE GIRL'S INNOCENCE. SHE'S BEEN INNOCENT FOR YEARS, AND YET THE MAN CHOOSES TO TAKE IT AWAY!!!1" This is very similar to your argument of "Hm, this is immoral because I don't like it. It makes me feel uncomfortable, let's spoil the fun and flag it. It's taking away her innocence, and lol sex doesn't take away innocence from teenagers as well, so this is completely different". Child pornography is different(That poor child...it's just cruel at that point...), but lolicon is not immoral...just really weird.

WHO gives a damn, its all friggin Hentai anyways. Yes everyone knows that molesting small children is sick. ITs artwork plain and simple and really art expresses something of the artist in it. For that reason I really don't see anything wrong with above picture while there are others that I think cross the line.

He he he... it's been kinda entertaining reading your comments ^_^

Sad oreno.imouto doesn't allow idle chat on the comments section of a picture, i find it kinda enjoyable listening to the clever comments written from both opposing parties. Neither side is wrong, neither is right... I almost wanna say it again in caps... (> NEITHER SIDE IS RIGHT <) So i did.

I kinda hope one day this site will have a bigger community that feels compelled to discuss posts in mass quantities... however... it's inevitable the trolls will flood with one worded comments <_<.I guess i should post this in the suggestions forum thing... but im too lazy. Im sure some crafty bastard will copy this idea and post it, i encourage it honestly, save me the trouble (not that i'll do it anyway) and saving this comment from having no use (which it really doesn't)

Anyway, im pro-loli, not that it matters. For all i care im wrong, i'll cry about it later for myself (as far as you know).

master_dood said:
I kinda hope one day this site will have a bigger community that feels compelled to discuss posts in mass quantities...

We are not a community.

Heh, for a mod I don't think you quite understand that an imageboard is a community effort.

For some some reason I never saw moe/oreno imouto as a community.
Just post good quality images, point some errors, say if you changed something. Ta-da.
That's how it works.

(I'm using the fact that I almost don't say anything to discount this extra comment. Sorry.)

while I believe there is such a thing as 'too loli' and that this image is just that, this did not make me feel like a pedophile, but re-enforced my feelings of.. not pedophile... as both my boner, and my eye brow dropped simultaneously. Stuff like this, I don't understand why it exists... Who benefits from this? (rhetorical question, IP can apparently be tracked quite easily from sites like this, and people are probably lookin!)

~woah, is this what being a troll feels like?~

I was the one who flagged this first.

I understand that some like loli but I saw this girl "too young" ("too loli, too excesive"...correct me if i'm wrong, the girl looks like a 4-5 year old?) and if things like "toddlercon" pass, then "babycon" will be created and passed...

so, if you permit it, let's say it's ok since i'm not the "overlords of the ore no imuoto .org" but I still find it "excesive".
MY TWO CENTS (i still love you, oreno . imouto . org)

Objectively speaking it's a drawing. Get over yourself and off your high horse. Seriously.

blacklist loli pussy if you don't want to see it :)

Hm, what master dood said makes sense. I think moe might be an imageboard site, but (it's only me) I feel like everyone here... It's like a community, a family. I'm so used to read everyone's comments, I always go check it, even if I don't post any comments, I love reading them. I think moe wouldn't be the same without the comments section.

Of course high quality manga is the main objective of the site, but I'm glad we can all chat and discuss together about everything we see and think. It's nicer to enjoy nice things with another person.

I guess the parent is helping her change her underwear? Get your mind out of the gutter.

Myrcavich_bx said:
I guess the parent is helping her change her underwear? Get your mind out of the gutter.

LOL, I, for one, would gladly keep my mind in the gutter for this pic. :D

is there anyway black list one specific image? I'm tired of this one showing up in the search results...

I had the same disapproval when I saw the sickening extreme_content "art". In dubioa pro rea it's not your choice to decide, but the admin.

what we could is give a new tag "extreme_loli" or something, which people can put on their blacklist.

In reverse, I have to say, only as an offended and sulked user:

We (that's oreno.imouto in fact) have some, I think, seriously sick pictures on this page too. They could stay. So this one here has to stay too. Everything else would be double moral standorts.

JASH said:
is there anyway black list one specific image? I'm tired of this one showing up in the search results...

No.

to much bullshit i think she should be getting up yhe ass

Downloaded it just to spite yall

You're not a very good troll, try harder.

K, I'll download it twice then.